Beber, B and Scacco, A (2012). What the Numbers Say: A Digit-Based Test for Election Fraud. Political Analysis 20 (2), pp. 211-234. DOI:10.1093/pan/mps003.
|
|
|
|
|
Breunig, C and Goerres, A (2011). Searching for Electoral Irregularities in an Established Democracy: Applying Benford’s Law Tests to Bundestag Elections in Unified Germany. Electoral Studies 30(3) September 2011, pp. 534-545.
|
|
|
|
|
Cantu, F and Saiegh, SM (2011). Fraudulent Democracy? An Analysis of Argentina’s Infamous Decade Using Supervised Machine Learning. Political Analysis 19 (4), pp. 409-433. DOI:10.1093/pan/mpr033.
|
|
|
|
|
Deckert, J, Myagkov, M and Ordeshook, PC (2011). Benford's Law and the Detection of Election Fraud. Political Analysis 19(3), pp. 245-268. DOI:10.1093/pan/mpr014.
|
|
|
|
|
Klimek, P, Yegorov, Y, Hanel, R and Thurner, S (2012). Statistical detection of systematic election irregularities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science October 109(41), pp. 16469-16473. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1210722109.
|
|
|
|
|
Mebane, WR Jr (2010). Fraud in the 2009 presidential election in Iran?. Chance 23(1), pp. 6-15. DOI:10.1080/09332480.2010.10739785.
|
|
|
|
|
Mebane, WR Jr (2013). Election Forensics: The Meanings of Precinct Vote Counts’ Second Digits. Prepared for presentation at the 2013 Summer Meeting of the Political Methodology Society, University of Virginia, July 18–20.
|
|
|
|
|
Pericchi, LR and Torres, DA (2011). Quick anomaly detection by the Newcomb-Benford law, with applications to electoral processes data from the USA, Puerto Rico and Venezuela. Statistical Science 26(4), pp. 502-16. DOI:10.1214/09-STS296.
|
|
|
|
|
Shikano, S and Mack, V (2011). When does 2nd Digit Benford´s Law-Test signal an election fraud? Facts or misleading test results. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 231 (5+6), 719-732.
|
|
|
|
|