Jiménez, R and Hidalgo, M (2014). Forensic Analysis of Venezuelan Elections during the Cha ́vez Presidency. PLOS ONE 9(6), pp. 1-18.
This work cites the following items of the Benford Online Bibliography:
Beber, B and Scacco, A (2012). What the Numbers Say: A Digit-Based Test for Election Fraud. Political Analysis 20 (2), pp. 211-234. DOI:10.1093/pan/mps003.
|
|
|
|
|
Cantu, F and Saiegh, SM (2011). Fraudulent Democracy? An Analysis of Argentina’s Infamous Decade Using Supervised Machine Learning. Political Analysis 19 (4), pp. 409-433. DOI:10.1093/pan/mpr033.
|
|
|
|
|
Deckert, J, Myagkov, M and Ordeshook, PC (2011). Benford's Law and the Detection of Election Fraud. Political Analysis 19(3), pp. 245-268. DOI:10.1093/pan/mpr014.
|
|
|
|
|
Drake, PD and Nigrini, MJ (2000). Computer assisted analytical procedures using Benford’s law. Journal of Accounting Education 18, pp. 127-146. DOI:10.1016/S0748-5751(00)00008-7.
|
|
|
|
|
Mebane, WR Jr (2008). Election forensics: The second-digit Benford’s law test and recent American presidential elections. In Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation, edited by R. Alvarez, T. Hall and S. Hyde. Washington, DC: Brookings Press, pp. 162–181
. ISSN/ISBN:978-0-8157-0138-5.
|
|
|
|
|
Mebane, WR Jr (2011). Comment on “Benford's Law and the Detection of Election Fraud”. Political Analysis 19(3), pp. 269-272. DOI:10.1093/pan/mpr024.
|
|
|
|
|
Pericchi, LR and Torres, DA (2011). Quick anomaly detection by the Newcomb-Benford law, with applications to electoral processes data from the USA, Puerto Rico and Venezuela. Statistical Science 26(4), pp. 502-16. DOI:10.1214/09-STS296.
|
|
|
|
|
Wallace, WA (2002). Assessing the quality of data used for benchmarking and decision-making. The Journal of Government Financial Management 51(3), pp. 16-22.
|
|
|
|
|