Political Analysis 19(3), pp. 245-268.
ISSN/ISBN: Not available at this time. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpr014
Abstract: The proliferation of elections in even those states that are arguably anything but democratic has given rise to a focused interest on developing methods for detecting fraud in the official statistics of a state's election returns. Among these efforts are those that employ Benford's Law, with the most common application being an attempt to proclaim some election or another fraud free or replete with fraud. This essay, however, argues that, despite its apparent utility in looking at other phenomena, Benford's Law is problematical at best as a forensic tool when applied to elections. Looking at simulations designed to model both fair and fraudulent contests as well as data drawn from elections we know, on the basis of other investigations, were either permeated by fraud or unlikely to have experienced any measurable malfeasance, we find that conformity with and deviations from Benford's Law follow no pattern. It is not simply that the Law occasionally judges a fraudulent election fair or a fair election fraudulent. Its “success rate” either way is essentially equivalent to a toss of a coin, thereby rendering it problematical at best as a forensic tool and wholly misleading at worst.
Bibtex:
@article{,
title={Benford's Law and the Detection of Election Fraud},
volume={19},
DOI={10.1093/pan/mpr014},
number={3},
journal={Political Analysis},
publisher={Cambridge University Press},
author={Deckert, Joseph and Myagkov, Mikhail and Ordeshook, Peter C.},
year={2011},
pages={245--268}
}
Reference Type: Journal Article
Subject Area(s): Voting Fraud